Those Who Benefit Are The Most Likely Perps

We see this logic used in crime dramas on TV all the time. Why does the media completely ignore this type of logic and instead reprint the official government line almost word-for-word without question? Why do most of us, as consumers of 'news' accept these reprinted government releases without question, even if they don't make sense?

The official story behind the most recent 'suicide' bombings that took place in Amman Jordan on November 9th, 2005 is another case that should have logic applied to it. Those who have been blamed for the attacks are those who's cause is hurt the most.

Not only that, but the story has changed repeatedly, taking it from 'bombs in the ceiling with Israelis evacuated beforehand' (a la Netanyahu before the London attacks) to suicide bombers from the Iraqi resistance, led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the apparent leader of "al Qaida in Iraq".

This photo from the Grand Hyatt Hotel shows clearly that the blast came from above the damaged ceiling - not below. Also, this seems to be the only damaged part of the ceiling, indicating that this is the area in which the bomb detonated.

If the bomb were strapped to a person who was blown to pieces you would expect some blood splatter on the white wall in the background - there is none.

How can these two pieces of evidence be ignored, unless the story is that the 'suicide' bomber walked in and climbed up above the false ceiling of a very crowded room before triggering the device.

How about the witness accounts about power going out only in the area of the bombing seconds before it occurred? That part is disappearing from coverage slowly.

These three pieces of evidence should make any sensible and intelligent person question the official story, because these facts contradict the official story.

In the best case, the mainstream media is a bunch of complete idiots to not see the holes in the story; but in the more likely scenario, editorial boards in Western media outlets are choosing the Western side in the 'Global War on Terrorism', even though available evidence says Western governments are lying through their teeth regularly, and should at least be held somewhat suspect.

Their story changes and evidence slowly disappears from public airing as the mainstream press and the governments get the facts to fit their "official" story. No matter who the evidence in a crime points to, it is obviously in our interests to pursue all leads - even if it leads back to those claiming to be the victims.

So we go back to the main question any investigator asks after a crime...who benefits? Does the Iraqi resistance benefit? How could they benefit from attacking fellow Arabs who are likely to sympathize with their situation in occupied Iraq? They don't - which makes them the least likely suspect.

I'm not gonna tell you what to believe or who to blame, because if you aren't intelligent enough to figure it out for yourself you won't believe me anyway. However here is some more to chew on :

- U.S. and Israeli intelligence has been implicated in other terror attacks against Western interests, as well as the assassination of Rafik Hariri in Lebanon.

- Israeli Intelligence, known as MOSSAD has been implicated in many false flag operations over the years, including the Lavon Affair and the attack on the USS Liberty.

- the apparent leader of 'al Qaida in Iraq' - Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who has claimed responsibility for this (and many other) 'suicide' attacks is apparently dead...see here and here. Oh yeah, and so is Osama(5th paragraph down).

- a U.S. Army study says this about Mossad : "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."